incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthieu Riou <matthieu.r...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review-Then-Commit
Date Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:59:43 GMT
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Leo Simons <mail@leosimons.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu@offthelip.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and
> >> how they use RTC.
> >>
> > Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is Cassandra and they're
> > doing RTC by community choice. They all seem to agree that RTC is the
> best
> > for their own codebase given that some parts of it can be pretty tricky.
> And
> > even committers who aren't too big on RTC generally speaking seem to
> agree
> > that it's working well for them (see [1] for the whole thread, including
> > Paul's objection). So it really seems to be community driven.
> >
> > Thank for the inputs.
>
> Cassandra does about the same thing as hadoop right, where patches go
> into jira for an explicit +1?
>
>
Exactly.


> While I think that's rather painful (if *I* were to do RTC I would
> definitely want to manage it within SVN perhaps with the aid of
> svnmerge.py), I don't think it is _wrong_. If the community really
> wants to do it that way, I say let them. Sorry Paul :)
>
> cheers,
>
> Leo
>
> PS: for the record I've followed cassandra on and off and I would most
> likely +1 on a graduation vote.
>
>
Good to know :)

Matthieu


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message