incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: JavaHL package namespace / migration / compatability
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:07:57 GMT

On Nov 16, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com 
> > wrote:
>> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of  
>> org.apache.
>
> Yes, I can only recall that the only exceptions has been where there
> are some formal specification backing the project, JSRs, the OSGi spec
> and the Jini spec comes to mind.

Right. Generally the specification classes *must* reside in the java  
name space. But implementation classes would have an  
org.apache.whatever name space.

Craig
>
> And as Ralph mentioned, a compatibility jar would IMHO be an
> acceptable compromise.
>
>
> Cheers
> -- 
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>
> I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message