Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26075 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2009 16:54:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Oct 2009 16:54:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 13668 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2009 16:54:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13463 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2009 16:54:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13453 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2009 16:54:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:54:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bryant.luk@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.205 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.205] (HELO mail-ew0-f205.google.com) (209.85.219.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:53:59 +0000 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so2962122ewy.27 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:53:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7bsqPJgVbObEsdYymvZ9v2PPS7ntSDMb7uDC/yE8Y4A=; b=nUzJhq6ReViqoBn87H8SjbPO7P12x1af3axP7nX0kv0fZOvOjLelPq1wEJDGzVLa89 1dc58HSyFMiHSAw5U6Jp/aylYmYSgE4rMAEM+IjuJY7/rcXV6iEfuQ4OSblHu0I+VZbc M36zZ6Dm8QcZcA0WpIrWmGA3SM/6fcDX0JvoU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S20fvL/3MfOxi6ehkURaYHdMPZxu+bPT9mXZb0jqs6kYlL5zgBZDkmRouFU3rHBMrA BHPUAlUaqjNivF6A+WEB15N27OTZGDwWaz9yB7CzjPaLdadqNvWeLCmaWQ/82GtJuckk qXw+zPrckyDFhx5tBA90vJmgyGgkcgQvmDpAA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.16 with SMTP id v16mr641799wee.162.1256921617176; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:53:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <30b2aef60910270309l4e7e7a04m7d6f4386e4c1ccd7@mail.gmail.com> <30b2aef60910271237o19bb6b85s5f20a0d766ad257f@mail.gmail.com> <30b2aef60910271510o28706dedw12b3a7f8376adeb9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:53:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0 From: Bryant Luk To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kevan, On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wro= te: > > On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > > >> >> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out >> a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I >> don't want to go and review all those very many binaries (or the build >> process that creates them) and I'm not familiar enough with the >> codebase to somehow "know" that all those binaries are somehow ok. If >> I had thought these minor tidbits that I raise are enough to actually >> vote -1, I would've made that clear, sorry that it wasn't. >> >> Even if I _did_ vote, releases are majority votes, and 2 +1 beats a >> single -1. Its just you need 3 votes. >> >> In other words, all you need is one more +1 :) > > Nick and Bryant, > I agree with Leo that the more accurate LICENSE/NOTICE files are > preferrable. I probably would not change my vote for this reason. However= , > I'll make this easier... Digging some more, I found the following issues, > which I missed earlier: > > axiom-api and axiom-impl jars > =A0* both contain NOTICES with "Portions copyright IBM" statements. Those > aren't mentioned in your NOTICE > > xml-apis > =A0* NOTICE contains copyright statements for ibm, sun, and w3c > =A0* contains additional license documentation (i.e. > LICENSE.dom-documentation.txt, LICENSE.dom-software.txt, and > LICENSE.sax.txt). If applicable, they need to be reflected in the wink > license. > > jcip-annotations > =A0* =A0i believe that this is licensed under creative commons attributio= n, yet > is not mentioned in either the license or the notice > > I'm changing my vote to a -1. > > --kevan I've added the axiom and jcip-annotations notices (and removed the unnecessary notices I think) in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/NOTICE Added the Creative Commons license for jcip-annotations to: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/LICENSE I would appreciate a review of these files for the binary release . The source release will have the basic Apache License and notice as originally suggested by Leo. Need to work some simple Maven magic but wanted to see if these files were ok first. Upon some further investigation, I'll remove the xml-api dependency since that isn't absolutely required for the Wink/Abdera functionality to work (so everything that was in the release candidate minus the xml-apis would also be in the future binary distribution) so that's why I didn't add the xml-api notice/license. Thanks for any feedback anyone can provide. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org