Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of seba.wagner@gmail.com
 designates 216.239.58.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=KsWn7AJXa19YMdRSChEhhQOkDvswOuQDn8dnc4lL0So/XfmXlgUOteBeFa2D4NrnIl
         8bgnNyyu0cIh2Q5pOu8sYFvFx62JeBwzB+IZArQ/lf/4o7ViT7kgwvgYVU8WFiLAWX7R
         WHzrtOCeKg7O1dK1zjU+06IQJ5viw8O1RvhNk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AE87C27.5030805@apache.org>
References: <1434b04c0910270358t5c524978t3a5094f4c33f4b70@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1434b04c0910270422j1f2c2d69l8c77517537fb1820@mail.gmail.com>
	 <B31FFB83-5B36-4B19-8D19-3777EEBB1F3D@tfd.co.uk>
	 <c30d70960910280719l72834607x130451591d0d252a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4AE87C27.5030805@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:10:14 +0100
Message-ID: <1434b04c0910281310s379607a0nf16bc315018c2e79@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache OpenMeetings incubator for Web Conferencing
From: Sebastian Wagner <seba.wagner@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f2774a03433b0477046241

--001485f2774a03433b0477046241
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi,

openmeetings _can_ be distributed without red5. Red5 acts like Tomcat
(actually it is a modified Tomcat). And openmeetings is a webapp inside this
container. For easy usage and installation we distribute it as one package,
but its still clear the its red5 + openmeetings.

Is a LGPL Library a general Issue? For running the application we also use
hibernate.
Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all
already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict?


sebastian

2009/10/28 Leif Hedstrom <zwoop@apache.org>

> On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
>
>> The better thing is that Adobe finally opened RTMP specification [1].
>> The specification license prohibits unintended use of rtmp for for
>> violating digital protection (this somehow relates to new GPL v.3
>> features) and intercepting video, othewise it is ok.
>>
>> Disclaimer. IMHO. IANAL.
>>
>> [1] http://www.adobe.com/devnet/rtmp/pdf/rtmp_specification_1.0.pdf
>>
>>
>
>
> Maybe further down the road, we can work together and implement this as a
> plugin for the Traffic Server project.  :)
>
> -- Leif
>
> [Note:  TS used to have streaming media protocol handlers, we ripped them
> out for the initial OpenSource release, but we'll revisit that later. Adding
> these as plugins instead of built-in the core is much cleaner.].
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
http://www.laszlo-forum.de
seba.wagner@gmail.com

--001485f2774a03433b0477046241--