incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bryant Luk <bryant....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.0
Date Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:53:24 GMT
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Bryant Luk <bryant.luk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Please note, I didn't actually vote on the release, I just pointed out
>>> a few things that probably ought to change. I didn't vote because I
>>> don't want to go and review all those very many binaries (or the build
>>> process that creates them) and I'm not familiar enough with the
>>> codebase to somehow "know" that all those binaries are somehow ok. If
>>> I had thought these minor tidbits that I raise are enough to actually
>>> vote -1, I would've made that clear, sorry that it wasn't.
>>>
>>> Even if I _did_ vote, releases are majority votes, and 2 +1 beats a
>>> single -1. Its just you need 3 votes.
>>>
>>> In other words, all you need is one more +1 :)
>>
>> Nick and Bryant,
>> I agree with Leo that the more accurate LICENSE/NOTICE files are
>> preferrable. I probably would not change my vote for this reason. However,
>> I'll make this easier... Digging some more, I found the following issues,
>> which I missed earlier:
>>
>> axiom-api and axiom-impl jars
>>  * both contain NOTICES with "Portions copyright IBM" statements. Those
>> aren't mentioned in your NOTICE
>>
>> xml-apis
>>  * NOTICE contains copyright statements for ibm, sun, and w3c
>>  * contains additional license documentation (i.e.
>> LICENSE.dom-documentation.txt, LICENSE.dom-software.txt, and
>> LICENSE.sax.txt). If applicable, they need to be reflected in the wink
>> license.
>>
>> jcip-annotations
>>  *  i believe that this is licensed under creative commons attribution, yet
>> is not mentioned in either the license or the notice
>>
>> I'm changing my vote to a -1.
>>
>> --kevan
>
> I've added the axiom and jcip-annotations notices (and removed the
> unnecessary notices I think) in:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/NOTICE
> Added the Creative Commons license for jcip-annotations to:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/LICENSE
>
> I would appreciate a review of these files for the binary release .
> The source release will have the basic Apache License and notice as
> originally suggested by Leo.  Need to work some simple Maven magic but
> wanted to see if these files were ok first.
>
> Upon some further investigation, I'll remove the xml-api dependency
> since that isn't absolutely required for the Wink/Abdera functionality
> to work (so everything that was in the release candidate minus the
> xml-apis would also be in the future binary distribution) so that's
> why I didn't add the xml-api notice/license.
>
> Thanks for any feedback anyone can provide.
>

I've moved the binary distribution NOTICE and LICENSE file to the
following location which will be used only for the binary
distribution:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/wink-scripts/wink-dist/binarydist/NOTICE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/wink-scripts/wink-dist/binarydist/LICENSE

The following will be used for the source only distribution:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/LICENSE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/trunk/NOTICE

Sorry for the noise but would still appreciate feedback for the above
to make sure we're doing it right.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message