Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56651 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2009 13:47:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2009 13:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 46098 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 13:47:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45897 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2009 13:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45886 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2009 13:47:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:47:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of david.bosschaert@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.211.202] (HELO mail-yw0-f202.google.com) (209.85.211.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:47:10 +0000 Received: by ywh40 with SMTP id 40so4633378ywh.32 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:46:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=knRtCSBWeCWN2oAHYMwnNDQg0PKTt1tAtuwP/m6bNy8=; b=rl7nDZOp3tD1foZ2CCxrsuRN9oDluScn1V+C8QYJ3/th2nSas3WZN6k2kPgu4jARV6 MQNwF5ALk1F5lif18zH0zyCUabxZU2xwlVDzHJhPS4cscS/Ws1msLCxv1p8ah7WT5z3f PNQO2ATuimn2K/oY+pzKCO021uOKfSU/n6EbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=SdXYuctWbxgOh8HF2TnaXfxhObNVIClI34ulZ6+APZrBBPHKCACBGHFCk6zih4fFad 6pllBWTgQv9qGz/yMq4unyV2Xy37yE7pFDkW9OVLNLuciJbh5HKVHOHBTJlbxFaDXXco CHP8Pb9iZK94/rs9r/d/Ivj5eiMpZLFBhr8a8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.242.2 with SMTP id p2mr4990653ybh.217.1254145609575; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:46:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Bosschaert Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:46:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [aries] Moved geronimo blueprint implementation into aries podling To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6a7aa8e2e820474a387e4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd6a7aa8e2e820474a387e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert > wrote: > > Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a > > shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc... > > I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries... > > Sure. > I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout. > I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now. > This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed, > but this is another problem we can address later. > Yes, I was thinking a single build system for now. The layout would be: /pom.xml (references all the submodules), can be used to kick off a build for everything in Aries /parent/... (parent poms, I was thinking of taking the ones from Geronimo Genesis as the starting point /blueprint (blueprint submodule) /xyz (other submodule) > > > Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally > not > > done for podlings? > > I guess Hudson should be ok. > I don't think podlings can use Nexus for the release, but that needs > to be double checked. > > I will get back when the root pom.xml is there. Dan or someone else with Hudson credentials can then enable. Cheers, David --000e0cd6a7aa8e2e820474a387e4--