From general-return-23015-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Sep 01 22:58:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53090 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 22:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 22:58:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 86141 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 22:58:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85929 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 22:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85910 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 22:58:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:58:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of francisdb@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.210] (HELO mail-bw0-f210.google.com) (209.85.218.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:58:14 +0000 Received: by mail-bw0-f210.google.com with SMTP id 6so348859bwz.12 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WoAJ/KXK2aLkJViiyLw9nZC4E/7VKDplaa4SJw6jaVI=; b=P/s/NHSRjcO5FdD20g+XUjz2472ZTVALPdfG8JtkMSWrxM0fxhDdP5RhX9t2amL2fR uAcNPyGQrTRITNXnQMSKCTnoywC8ZfG3XHmOapx3rPORnnYOjKPBsqa5Gul3zeAzvIvx Un/eprjjwi9Zups4D1wF7yyquTJhx3XjseHZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QlEacr/i6FsMLmEpdcHnJJH7UbORhDsXH72Y6bGqggPQgPZ2kGLXi5FSwuxBhm0y/m mzLgC57dVuVka7PvfAxF4itwj8/k4uriNNGI6S7mXUMgSis5XbLO9mBKI0F2tigUAJEs hanNqQJoW8isXK6v5KhoTavP4d8QvA0+NoeZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.65 with SMTP id x1mr6016825bkv.6.1251845872281; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:57:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0909010846mcc75e24y1673f0fa944949cc@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ab983230908310044r7ef62a83tf5aec8658f021628@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0909010814h4b9e92e0s912b75d35bcc3299@mail.gmail.com> <3ab983230909010832m1f7864eevd4b63a944252ee43@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0909010846mcc75e24y1673f0fa944949cc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: <3ab983230909011557n521a3c08vbbbf35a8177c4f8f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2) From: Francis De Brabandere To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: empire-db-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> =A0> The new release candidate uses exactly the same name for the artifa= cts >> =A0> and the SVN tag. >> =A0> >> =A0> This makes it very difficult to determine later what was actually v= oted on. >> >> >> Hmm, I don't see how this can be changed when using nexus, the Idea >> =A0there is to 'stage' a release and avoid it to be sent to the main >> =A0maven repo if it is not 100% correct. So for a 2.0.5 to get in there >> =A0we need to release as 2.0.5. And if this release fails I see no other >> =A0way than to start over using the same tags (renaming failed tag) >> =A0I could rename the tags to rc-1, rc-2 but that would not correspond t= o >> =A0the versions used in the pom's. >> >> =A0How do you suggest we do this? > > No idea, but at least some other Incubator projects seem to manage > this OK, as shown by threads here. ok I talked about this on #maven and this is what they came up with .... we are using nexus hi francisdb, we are cutting M3-rc1 M3-rc2 etc over at OWB there has been a (reaaaaaly long) discusson on the commons list on this topic maybe you can check markmail.org for it. I suppose he is talking about this thread or soem related thread http://markmail.org/search/?q=3Dcommons%20nexus%20staging#query:commons%20n= exus%20staging%20list%3Aorg.apache.commons.dev+page:1+mid:bdjkatfcwukxsugn+= state:results francisdb, we typically stage rc's for testing but only call votes on the last one the final version may end up being staged multiple times with the same version number but using rc's reduces that likelyhood I see so your final version tag might be created/deleted a few times ... So overwriting the tag should not be a problem as the maven guys are also doing that. But indeed before calling a vote we might want to have some rc's inspected to reduce the likelihood of a failing vote Do you agree with this idea? Thanks, Francis --=20 http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org