incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [aries] Moved geronimo blueprint implementation into aries podling
Date Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:46:28 GMT
2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert
> <david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a
> > shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc...
> > I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries...
>
> Sure.
> I guess the first thing  though is to decide on the svn layout.
> I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now.
> This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed,
> but this is another problem we can address later.
>

Yes, I was thinking a single build system for now. The layout would be:
/pom.xml (references all the submodules), can be used to kick off a build
for everything in Aries
/parent/... (parent poms, I was thinking of taking the ones from Geronimo
Genesis as the starting point
/blueprint (blueprint submodule)
/xyz (other submodule)


>
> > Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally
> not
> > done for podlings?
>
> I guess Hudson should be ok.
> I don't think podlings can use Nexus for the release, but that needs
> to be double checked.
>
>
I will get back when the root pom.xml is there. Dan or someone else with
Hudson credentials can then enable.

Cheers,

David

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message