incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Peshev <ppes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi
Date Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:49:54 GMT
Hi Jeremy,

Since you are asking about potential committers - at least to me a new
OSGi project focused on Java EE sounds quite interesting.

Btw, when looking at the proposal I would  personally suggest even to
expand the scope and include other Java enterprise concepts - for
example integration with JMS (i.e. ActiveMQ) , JCA resource adapters ,
or addressing the usecase for integration of  non-Apache Java EE
components (EclipseLink, etc.). Would you consider these as in scope
for the project ?

Best Regards
Peter Peshev

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Hughes<hughesj@apache.org> wrote:
> Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked
> about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, please
> would Felix committers willing to spend time helping the (proposed)
> Aries podling add their names to the initial committer list on the
> proposal wiki [1]. This naturally extends beyond Felix committers.
>
> Apologies for x-post to dev@felix ... I wanted to attract as many as
> possible :-)
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriesProposal
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> 2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>:
>> Karl,
>>
>> Please don't get me wrong. Felix is choice for an excellent *destination*
>> TLP. The Incubator PMC itself was setup to take away the responsibility for
>> training incoming folks from existing TLP(s). So my gut feeling is that we
>> should allow the incubation process to go on and decide on destination and
>> scope once the project is ready to graduate. I am sure the folks on the
>> proposal would love to get any and every help they can get to graduate as
>> well as on the technical front. Please do continue to provide help and
>> guidance.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On 09/05/2009 10:29 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas<davanum@gmail.com>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Karl,
>>>>
>>>> There are *many* TLP(s) with overlapping scope as James Strachan pointed
>>>> out
>>>> earlier in the thread.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't see the need to shoe horn a new community with new code into an
>>>> existing TLP just because of scope. For all you know by the time they get
>>>> out of the incubator their scope may change a bit (or more).
>>>
>>> I'm sorry if it looked like I wanted to shoe horn anything into felix.
>>> That wasn't my goal as for me it was a question of where I would like
>>> it to happen and as I said earlier already, not the end of the world
>>> if not.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> dims
>>>>
>>>> On 09/05/2009 04:31 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The question
>>>>> is about the scope and goals of Aries and more specifically about the
>>>>> part where it is about being an umbrella for OSGi EE spec
>>>>> implementations where it has been argued that this could/should be
>>>>> done at felix
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message