incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi
Date Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:05:41 GMT

As a point of note, not all OSGi spec implementations live in Felix even at 
Apache today.   The Remote Services/Distributed OSGi reference implementation 
is a sub project of CXF.     I think Tuscany has an implementation as well.

So far, there hasn't been any discussion about moving those into Felix.  Your 
argument below makes it sound like they should be.

Dan


On Thu September 3 2009 1:33:04 pm Richard S. Hall wrote:
> There was no attempt to contact the Felix PMC in general that I am aware
> and I certainly didn't know about it in advance.
> 
> And there seems to be a continued attempt to construe my original
> criticisms as "all of Aries should go into Felix".
> 
> I, personally, do not believe that all of Aries should go into Felix, I
> too think it should have its own identity. I was always only ever
> referring to the independent OSGi spec implementations. I was arguing
> that Felix is a good place to work on them, since it is part of what it
> is trying to achieve.
> 
> Further, I don't really understand the implication that somehow the
> burden is now on the Felix community to go and contribute to Aries on
> OSGi spec implementations just because of this proposal, when there was
> no attempt to work with the Felix community on creating OSGi spec
> implementations in the first.
> 
> The only conclusions I see being drawn by people who have invested very
> little in Felix is that we should dismantle the Felix charter so that we
> can accommodate the fact that some people don't want to play with us.
> 
> At that rate, I stand by my previous "vote" and otherwise people can do
> whatever they want in Aries.
> 
> -> richard
> 
> On 9/3/09 13:23, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Kevan,
> >
> > Was a contact with Felix made prior to dropping the proposal here? I got
> > the impression that wasn't the case, which I find surprising... If I am
> > wrong, what was the meat of such?
> >
> > I'm also less happy with the rhetoric here repeated over and over,
> > seemingly uninterested in discussion of reaching a solution everyone can
> > accept. (From both camps, btw)
> >
> > -- Niclas
> >
> > On Sep 4, 2009 12:53 AM, "Kevan Miller"<kevan.miller@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 3, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:>  On Thu, Sep 3, 2009
> > at 3:19 AM, William A. Ro...
> > Totally agree. Had certainly hoped that Felix committers would be
> > interested in joining...
> >
> > --kevan
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> > unsubscribe, e-mail: gene...
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message