Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47583 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2009 12:56:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2009 12:56:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 77221 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2009 12:57:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77018 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2009 12:57:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77008 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2009 12:57:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:57:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com) (209.85.219.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:56:54 +0000 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so631427ewy.27 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:56:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IHtFy3vVMV7S4jAG3N2TM757/k6HtPjN+f+7xnNkMZo=; b=Sy5bE6gzEfEJTfoqXPU5PSdtXVP9tsC68/9kkMLwKA2NNTI+ZeXwytlVHnESgzR3Lk 0AeSub+ETaKSdN9T5yuXgyGlyL41BYe0Wj+2KDZJdRshHqcClBfS25nhJzCsPPZNMPUP g8Qi7/22aK0nZ7NATs09G/gtX07932fZyi6lM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pVaOnmb1kJZFerVg3SOCJzYUbLtUKgWijsWbgQBAQYrTicY2I/yY2tDQT+ngbRnQcm Jq/VLu+Y/qoxY/rl4ZYOR9VGU5LKA4vKHIMTQn1ARLO9je0o9G2BvL9TfiT09r/v03Bc 90zp2zulxOpW8qKBvtjz5YSvaLloNkn0DZJ0Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.28.207 with SMTP id g57mr207992wea.163.1250859392070; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:56:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0908210539y1797ce63qa08cd036a97a8360@mail.gmail.com> References: <25aac9fc0908210356y1caa4c90tc556a6cd69e4111a@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0908210452p49d8a1a8if9f15b5adf8a6685@mail.gmail.com> <918312fe0908210458v646766b2ye2458584a911e081@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0908210505k7a80ebcfy4d805589ca159135@mail.gmail.com> <3ab983230908210519m53549974lb43965cdcc775625@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0908210539y1797ce63qa08cd036a97a8360@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:56:32 +0100 Message-ID: <25aac9fc0908210556o5f84c012o6ffdbd7e0a58003e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5 From: sebb To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 21/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) > > > Scripts to download and unpack the archives. > Scripts to check sigs and hashes. > > WinMerge and > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases/compare_dirs.pl > > Eyes ;-) > And following links - sorry, just spotted that the NOTICE file says: "This product includes software originally developed by ESTEAM Software. For further information see http://www.empire-db.org" However, the link redirects back to http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/ Perhaps that should have some information on the provenance. > > On the distribution file(s). Is this standard practice described somewhere. > > > No, but just have a look at some other projects. > I'm not saying it's the only practice (cf. Apache Wicket), but the > majority of projects have two sets of archives, and it is ASF policy > to vote on the source, not binaries. > > > > Can you suggest a model project that is using maven? > > > Almost all of Commons now use Maven2. > > > > If we have binaries separated should we also provide libraries in that zip? > > > Yes, depending on the licensing of the 3rd party libraries. > These should be added a build time, not added to SVN. > But you should consider whether this will make the archive too large. > > You might wish to release 2 binary archives, one just empire-db and > one of dependencies. > > E.g. HttpComponents HttpClient does this. > > > > Since we moved to maven this is kind of a first release all over > > again... We're going to fix all issues and come back with a proper > > release later this month. > > > > Thanks for the thorough review. > > > OK, one more point I forgot to mention: the format of the hashes, i.e. > > target/dist/apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.tar.gz: > 34 81 4D D7 5E EB 49 F1 50 49 64 91 2C 83 04 96 > > is not the normal format, and does not play well with automated checkers. > > The normal format is: > > 34814DD75EEB49F1504964912C830496 *apache-empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.tar.gz > > or possibly just > > 34814DD75EEB49F1504964912C830496 > > Likewise for the SHA-1 hash if provided. > > This is not a blocker, but please fix if possible. > > > > > > Francis > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:05 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > > >> > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard practise. > > >> > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > > >> > separate binary archive. > > >> > > >> > > >> FWIW, Apache Wicket has released combined binary/source archives since > > >> its inception. Not something that needs changing. > > >> > > >> > > >> > The archive does not have a DISCLAIMER file - yes, the disclaimer text > > >> > is in README, but the general practise is for a separate file. > > >> > > >> > > >> DISCLAIMER should be next to LICENSE, NOTICE and README. Remember to > > >> remove upon graduation :-) > > >> > > >> > > >> > The NOTICE file is incorrect. The date is 2008, and the second > > >> > paragraph must be: > > >> > > > >> > This product includes software developed at > > >> > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > > >> > > > >> > i.e. switch the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs > > >> > > >> > > >> Should be fixed. > > >> > > >> > > >> > Minor points: > > >> > > > >> > It would be useful to include compiler source and target versions as > > >> > headers in the jar manifests (the manifests are otherwise good) > > >> > > >> > > >> Shouldn't maven do this already? [1] > > > > > > The headers referred to in [1] are present, I was referring to headers such as: > > > > > > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.5 > > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.5 > > > > > > These need to be added manually. Not essential, but can be very useful. > > > > > >> Martijn > > >> > > >> [1] http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/examples/manifest.html > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.somatik.be > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org