Return-Path: 
 <general-return-22843-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53007 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2009 14:53:45 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2009 14:53:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 50239 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 14:54:03 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50041 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 14:54:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50020 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2009 14:54:03 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:54:03 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.208 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.219.208] (HELO mail-ew0-f208.google.com)
 (209.85.219.208)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:53:54 +0000
Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so370372ewy.27
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=qiFjkaUexRwA9NjxcxJ8JazfCNc7wJpboKQIyXY+C2Q=;
        b=Plxc9nGOVb+RaxCrO5u1dfj1AOYvfx+A+uSh/23QJbP2zZoljsylcklQCe1gCWUgD9
         u2bB4EUBSSqIdTLCtt42VpFO6K97aPXuyWee2UseWBWYnKsiDNztMPXghK5iAfGHQ/oP
         SciOtWEbs3PZkWcipmNQ37OmWYtFDK5ZLE+VE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=RVeHGbvOgIogwQOcNk515OLLBuNan7rrE4o7owPr6tWD4s3P5WSvlBQbaH20krdZ2r
         4wP1/L9mnaMDiVG6l75i7dI8i8ETrBgMlZnWPjJjzO22gJSlRav/rQB8dtqZap66qTr+
         KS0eUvOfJJZgvjmIh2XADeGXwqVJB5YMGWLRU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.8.65 with SMTP id 43mr1367376weq.168.1250607213834; Tue,
	18 Aug 2009 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <71e1b5740908180731u25433942te42d7405980ccba3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1250280507.4648.94.camel@achilles>
	 <1250562406.4648.185.camel@achilles>
	 <25aac9fc0908180501l366d4d00s3051519bc79370cd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <71e1b5740908180731u25433942te42d7405980ccba3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:53:33 +0100
Message-ID: <25aac9fc0908180753u650a7126n3253029daf76a25@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0-beta1
From: sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org, antelder@apache.org
Cc: cassandra-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 18/08/2009, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM, sebb<sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 18/08/2009, Eric Evans <eevans@rackspace.com> wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  The vote is now closed with the following results:
>  >>
>  >>   * +1 votes: 3 (Matthias Wessendorf, Ant Elder, Ian Holsman)
>  >>   * 0 votes: 0
>  >>   * -1 votes: 0
>  >>
>  >>  The vote passes.
>  >
>  > I wish to raise an objection - there are several 3rd party libraries
>  > in the binary release which don't have have corresponding licenses in
>  > the LICENSE file.
>  >
>  > Furthermore, the NOTICE file fails to credit any of the 3rd party
>  > libraries, apart from Groovy.
>  >
>
>
> Sebb, as has been said here on this vote thread, legal-discuss@, and
>  done in previous releases from other TLPs and poddlings, it doesn't
>  need to do either of those. The LICENSEs _are_ included in separate
>  license files and that is an OK approach. And AFAICT none of the 3rd
>  party dependencies require any mention in the NOTICE file, for example
>  the LEGAL-59 JIRA agrees nothing is required for the BSD license.

No, it doesn't exactly say that.
The way I read it currently, the BSD notice needs to go into the
NOTICE or LICENSE file, not a license file.
Besides, the JIRA is still open.

Also not resolved is the fact that the main LICENSE file neither
includes nor has pointers to the other licenses.

>    ...ant
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org