From general-return-22928-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Aug 21 11:55:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16217 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2009 11:55:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2009 11:55:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 82388 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2009 11:55:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82212 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2009 11:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82202 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2009 11:55:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ant.elder@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.221] (HELO mail-bw0-f221.google.com) (209.85.218.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:55:18 +0000 Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so386826bwz.12 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:54:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IjXn70unsyQGH4i5JgRtAfu6p9gJRBOnVy74W4xnMkQ=; b=myX2tdf0iMZ41RC+FlapOZXI0KPC7R9lBBRzMCYH371m2lPQUNkkcStx73HATlKh5S q+FEkKniPXxI3N14dMDdK2x+SVPCFeHCdNFF5wcSee24wVoseYIhcQeiL9AEEI3kNIRJ Fqmbmh0usEM8NXB85X2M9u2W0ehIJoIuzNsUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fR3KuBcTkecOyO8zrHbs/DrYQOhfdu00pTCbY93wt/Go/B1Hwg84fT7Pk6NyThHTaA KR5J/81yhVJoXaz8fIUpSBjsYtsUMild9XAxf8utrwFOQHgMelvKSe3oIKWEPeVyRmAZ 6Rz/FK4JpRLsI+xJQl6yX/oz4JVV948MTxGiQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ant.elder@gmail.com Reply-To: antelder@apache.org Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr889651bku.28.1250855697065; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:54:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <71e1b5740908202358j5a49a9cfp764d3cb1de91274f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:54:57 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a378303f6765e14f Message-ID: <71e1b5740908210454q628ab9f4h172d740ff5a00345@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process From: ant elder To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:40 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: > > On Fri 21 Aug 2009 14:58, ant elder wrote: > >> What do people think about changing the poddling release voting >> process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the >> poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a >> poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? > > My only concern is that we have some very great volunteers here on the > general@ list who check release compliance and I doubt they want to deal > with the traffic of every podling dev list. > They wouldn't have to deal with extra traffic as they wont need to subscribe to dev lists just as for committer/ppmc votes we don't need to subscribe to all the poddling private lists. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org