Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91051 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2009 22:19:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2009 22:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 2496 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 22:20:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2308 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2009 22:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2298 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2009 22:20:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:20:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com designates 75.180.132.123 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.180.132.123] (HELO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (75.180.132.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:20:24 +0000 Received: from jean-andersons-computer.local ([76.88.116.210]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090726222001455.OPLS26619@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:20:01 +0000 Message-ID: <4A6CD690.6080208@bristowhill.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:20:00 -0700 From: "Jean T. Anderson" Reply-To: jta@bristowhill.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Suspending Projects References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Noel J. Bergman wrote: > This thread really needs to be put to a conclusion as policy and procedure. On the table we have: > > Suspension would include: > > -- disable the mailing lists (no need to moderate) > -- disable commit access (no need to review changes) > -- change the index of projects > > The idea being to both flag it as dormant, and to remove the oversight requirements that we have, by disabling anything requiring oversight. > > There seems to be some disagreement over the word "suspend", which is being used in reference to an existing dormant state, not sending someone to the Headmaster's office to be removed from school. > > what about "pause" ? I'm not spotting negative overtones in any of the dictionaries I've consulted. A pause button icon could flag a project that is currently inactive. just a thought, -jean p.s. did any doctors of middle english weigh in? > There also seems to be a disagreement over the idea that inactive projects don't require oversight, but I feel that if we don't close the mailing lists, they will not be properly moderated (moderators still have to wade through spam looking for any faint signal), and people would wonder why they send messages that get lost. And we don't want to miss commit messages. It is best to structureally disable the resources than to trust in lack of use. > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org