Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4A689D48.4050500@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:26:32 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wookie IP clearance
References: <61c9bc470907201143r5dad54fekcd1b1095138046a2@mail.gmail.com>
 <E60391D7-F20C-4441-A5BB-1B56BAB557F5@jaguNET.com>
 <4A676926.40706@rowe-clan.net>
 <CAF42266-DC24-4123-A078-5666E4FDE05A@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF42266-DC24-4123-A078-5666E4FDE05A@jaguNET.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
>>
>> How is incubator PMC to evaluate this question?
>>
>> Apparently the submitters are cool with it, or it would not be on their
>> proposal :)
>>
> 
> Just closing the loop on the various trademark debates being done
> on prc@ and members@, of course.
> 
> It's called oversight.

That Incubator does to the best we can per all sorts of policies.
The only policy communicated here thus far is to avoid Trademarks,
and according to TESS, three claims containing the word "Wookie"
(one exact match, registered IC 028) are all dead marks.

Unless you mean something else that isn't formulated yet, and
therefore impossible to discern?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org