Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33654 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2009 21:38:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2009 21:38:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 51023 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 21:38:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50825 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2009 21:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50814 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2009 21:38:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:38:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [84.14.33.41] (HELO mail.goojet.com) (84.14.33.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:38:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.goojet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB02A20006 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:35:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at goojet.com Received: from mail.goojet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.goojet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIsbaWuW4pyZ for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poukram2.local (lns-bzn-51f-81-56-134-235.adsl.proxad.net [81.56.134.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.goojet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DE75A20005 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A511D39.4020205@apache.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:38:01 +0200 From: Sylvain Wallez User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal for Wookie a W3C Widget/Google Wave widget engine References: <61c9bc470907030701t5e7431a6x66e06554cadf2db4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <61c9bc470907030701t5e7431a6x66e06554cadf2db4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ross Gardler wrote: > I would like to submit the Wookie project proposal to the Incubator > PMC. Our draft is appended to the end of this mail and is available > at: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WookieProposal > > A quick overview of Wookie is: > > Wookie is a Java server application that allows you to upload and > deploy widgets for your applications. Wookie is based on the W3C > Widgets specification, but widgets can also be included that use > extended APIs such as Google Wave Gadgets and OpenSocial. > > I have agreed to champion and mentor this proposal, Gavin McDonald has > also agreed to mentor, more mentors are being sought - let me know if > you are interested. > > At this stage I am seeking feedback on or questions about the Wookie > proposal. The project team are subscribed to this list and ready to > respond to any queries. > The W3C widget spec is more targetted at standalone installation of widgets (like the Mac's Dashboard, Yahoo widgets, Vista widgets, etc) and Wookie as I understand it aims a providing a server-side implementation of this specification. This is an interesting point of view that can allow a wider audience to use this specification that is currently mostly of interest to mobile phone vendors. Now I'm curious to know if a server-side implementation will not hit some technical difficulities related to the implementation of a client-side specification (I saw that already with XForms). What's interesting also, is that W3C widgets and OpenSocial gadgets are more or less competing specifications, and it seems from this proposal and what I saw in the code that Wookie would like to bridge the gap by providing OpenSocial features to W3C widgets. Is my understanding right? This looks like an interesting proposal, and I'm willing to help it through incubation if it is accepted by mentoring it. We must also consider the potential overlap with Shinding and Social Site and see what kind of collaboration (if any) with these projects would make sense. As a side note, I'd love to run W3C widgets on my Android phone and my iPod Touch. Would client-side implementations of the W3C spec fit in the Wookie project? Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org