incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>
Subject Re: IP clearance question
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:55:31 GMT
Follow up question, I assume our vote to accept the contribution is 
still acceptable as well as the software grant from Paremus. So, the 
only necessary action is to have Paremus submit a new, Apache compatible 
archive. Is that correct?

-> richard

On 7/6/09 12:52 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
>
> -> richard
>
> On 7/6/09 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to perform IP clearance on the Sigil project to Felix.
>>>
>>> The contributed archive contains some embedded JAR files, one of which
>>> is covered by AGPL, which is a modified version of GPL. I am told by
>>> Paremus (the contributors) that only two minor classes depend on this
>>> JAR and it could be easily removed from Sigil with very minor impact.
>>>
>>> So, the question I have is, do we need them to submit a new archive 
>>> that
>>> doesn't contain this code or is it sufficient for us to strip this code
>>> before importing the contributed code to SVN?
>>
>> GPL [AGPL] is viral.  The entire archive is copyleft.
>>
>> You need clear AL 2.0 submission by the original authors, with no pieces
>> of GPL code whatsoever.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message