incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Bypassing Incubator
Date Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:04:52 GMT
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Gavin <gavin@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, can someone tell me what the rules are regarding TLPs bringing in
>> subprojects directly to their TLP rather than coming through incubator?
> 
> To add to Bill's response, the general position is;
> 
> 1. Any substantial codebase needs at least IP Clearance in Incubator,
> which is effectively just a record of where/when/how it came from, and
> an opportunity for Incubator PMC members to have a look and make sure
> that there is no flagrant IP issues.

I never understood this part.  Why is the Incubator PMC any more
qualified to decide if incoming code contains a "fragrant IP issue" than
the destination TLP PMC?  After all, the TLP PMC are doing that check
continuously for the day to day contributions received.

I agree that more eyes are better, but then it would not be the
Incubator PMC specifically that could catch such problems.

Regards,
Tim

> 2. If there is no additional 'community', for instance a single
> developer contributing the work into a project, and if the TLP PMC is
> comfortable to take on that codebase with or without such contributor
> as new committer, then that is Ok.
> 
> 3. If the TLP is not interested in taking ownership of the codebase,
> but there are people within the TLP who are interested, then we
> recommend Incubation for the codebase+community even if the community
> is effectively just exising Apache committers (example Ace).
> 
> 
> Cheers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message