incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Olio 0.1 Release
Date Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:29:29 GMT
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
> Can anyone else please take a look at the Olio podling release?

+1 (after consulting thread below)

a little feedback to pass on:

OlioDriver.jar does not contain LICENSE and NOTICE. it should not be
distributed indepedently (for example, through the maven repository).
when distributing independently is also best to include full vendor
details in the MANIFEST

- robert

> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Ok.
>>
>> I'll vote +1 for this release. These then fall into the category of
>> licenses that aren't explicit in the distribution although they are clearly
>> licensed with the category A MIT license.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 8:34 PM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>>
>>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've checked all the signatures and a couple of md5s and they're ok.
>>>>
>>>> PHP:
>>>>
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>> RAILS:
>>>>
>>>> I think the treatment of acts_as_network, calendar_helper, rspec-rail,
>>>> rails_rcov, rspec are fine.
>>>>
>>>> The actual licenses for fixture_replacement2, country_select are buried
>>>> in their README. I won't hold up the release for this, but in future, the
>>>> license should be extracted and placed in its own LICENSE file in the
>>>> subdirectory.
>>>>
>>>> Just one issue: I couldn't find the *actual* LICENSE for attachment_fu,
>>>> white_list. Can you tell me where they are?
>>>>
>>> attachment_fu and white_list (among many others) are written by Rick
>>> Olsen and his license is located at
>>> http://svn.techno-weenie.net/projects/plugins/LICENSE.
>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>> Shanti
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Okay. I've re-spun the release. I fixed the following :
>>>>> a) Added NOTICE and LICENSE files to the source packages
>>>>> b) Generated rat outputs for the binary packages and renamed all the
>>>>> rat outputs consistenly
>>>>> c) Fixed the rails NOTICE and LICENSE files to include the missing
>>>>> third-party plugins.
>>>>> d) Added apache license headers to the Release Notes, and the rails
>>>>> plugin 'rorclassify'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review and VOTE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shanti
>>>>>
>>>>> Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig,
>>>>>> Thanks very much for checking this out. My answers below :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shanti
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Shanti,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Much improved compared to last time. Lots of work respinning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I verified signatures; all ok.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are four artifacts (times tar.gz and .zip; plus sigs and
sums)
>>>>>>> so there should be four rat outputs: php, php source, rails,
rails source.
>>>>>>> There are only two rat output files. This isn't a showstopper
but just an
>>>>>>> inconvenience for reviewers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay. I'll run rat on the other two as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release notes have no license but there's not a clear requirement
>>>>>>> for these files to have such a license. It's worth considering
adding a
>>>>>>> license if only to clean up the rat output but no issue from
me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seemed odd to add hdrs to release notes - I guess I can add them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I found some issues that make me -1 on release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The rat output for php and rails source doesn't show the LICENSE
and
>>>>>>> NOTICE files, and indeed, these are missing from the src distributions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are right. This is probably a bug in the build script.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following files don't appear to contain any copyright or
license
>>>>>>> information at all. The author(s) need to be contacted for license
>>>>>>> information before this file can be included. Or the license
covering this
>>>>>>> file needs to be identified and added to the file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_network/lib/zetetic/acts/network.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_network/test/network_test.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_network/test/schema.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_network/test/test_helper.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_taggable/lib/acts_as_taggable.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/acts_as_taggable/lib/tag.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/attachment_fu/lib/geometry.rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-olio-rails-src-0.1/webapp/rails/trunk/vendor/plugins/attachment_fu/lib/technoweenie/attachment_fu.rb
>>>>>>> ... many more .rb files. Perhaps these files are covered by an
>>>>>>> external license that I didn't see? If so, a comment in the files
>>>>>>> referencing the copyright holder and a reference to the license
would be
>>>>>>> fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have mentioned acts_as_network etc. in the LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>>>>>> They are all MIT license. I have left out a couple. Will add them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will re-spin the release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Shanti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry it took so long. I had a lot of licenses to sort through
and
>>>>>>>> cleanup. I believe I finally have resolved everything. The
artificats are
>>>>>>>> available at http://people.apache.org/~shanti/olio_0.1/
>>>>>>>> The rat outputs are available in the same directory and called
>>>>>>>> 'php-rat.out' and 'rails-rat.out'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please take a look and vote your approval ASAP but no later
than
>>>>>>>> 4/10. If you find any issues, I will re-spin.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Shanti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message