incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pivot 1.1 (second try)
Date Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:26:40 GMT
On 16/04/2009, Todd Volkert <tvolkert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, per the recommendations on the legal-discuss thread and here (and
>  just to make sure we're fully in keeping with the spirit of ASF
>  policies), I've removed the offending files from the tag (and copied

s/tag/branch/ ?

>  the branch to the tag), which can be found at:
>
>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pivot/tags/v1.1/

Thanks.

The SVN tag now agrees with the source archive contents.

>  Note: I did NOT regenerate the release archives because there's no
>  need - nothing has changed from their perspective.  This only related
>  to what was in SVN that *wasn't* part of the release artifacts.  Thus,
>  I am not calling for a new vote -- the existing vote should proceed as
>  planned.

AFAICS the archives look OK, so no objections from me.

>  Thanks everyone for taking the time to look at this.  I appreciate the
>  due diligence you're putting into this, because I know it takes time
>  to review someone else's release, and it's making the end result that
>  much more solid.
>
>  -T
>
>  p.s. on the trunk, we've just migrated the demos sub-project and the
>  JFreeChart provider off of the ASF repository for good (see
>  http://code.google.com/p/pivot-demos/ and
>  http://code.google.com/p/pivot-jfree/).  We have multiple contributors
>  working on various demos at any given time, and I'm not confident that
>  relying on each of them to be a licensing expert is remotely workable,
>  so it's much easier just to say "Pivot is at ASF -- demo applications
>  for Pivot are at Google Code".
>
>
>  On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Todd Volkert <tvolkert@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200904.mbox/browser
>  >
>  > Summary:
>  > (a) Some consider SVN to be part of your distribution, and some don't,
>  > so there's no true resolution there
>  > (b) Per http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator,
>  > this weighs on us less because we're an incubating project that had
>  > these dependencies before we joined the ASF.
>  >
>  > Bottom line:
>  > We'll remove those dependencies from SVN altogether in the trunk (and
>  > thus for all future releases) by migrating them to Google Code -- just
>  > to make sure there's no ambiguity about what's ASF-compliant and
>  > what's not.  But in the meantime, based on the two points above, this
>  > shouldn't hold up the 1.1 release.
>  >
>  > -T
>  >
>  > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Todd Volkert <tvolkert@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >>> We don't have any LGPL libraries in the distribution - only in SVN, for
some demos that aren't actually included in the distribution artifacts.
>  >>
>  >> Or dependencies of any kind, for that mater.  The actual *release* is
>  >> compliant with ASF's policies.  If our SVN repository is not, that
>  >> will be fixed as soon as I get an answer from legal, and I can strip
>  >> out the code from the trunk as well as the tag, but all the while, the
>  >> tarballs and zip files were compliant.
>  >>
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message