Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hedhman@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.240 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mjnjRxRBM069i6uPMGUS12LS242aOuOsx/NAtpFwNR5Tm4BoCQrBG8yo0Hogcmyp2N
         8oDXrrwSN+pOG+2ACchjwmByz4Qd1kgazdKAEnruzpMzD7m0zg7aZ+mX5M5qFEbLt4sa
         SlFJJtK2izOWe8SBB994m22VbpTvpzmEKRVos=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hedhman@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <5100991A-7CB6-41BC-8AF1-1CB30E11A28E@gmail.com>
References: <5100991A-7CB6-41BC-8AF1-1CB30E11A28E@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:04:45 +0800
Message-ID: <caf30e2a0903032304g4e09e15fy9e30919464fe8e52@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Etch 1.0.2-incubating
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1, Mentor and binding.

I have checked the legal aspects of this release and can not find
anything particularly wrong about it. I also gave the 'heads-up' for
waiting with the package name change.

All in all, the guys have been very active working on this release in
an open, transparent manner, with what seems to be all discussions on
list. I would like to see some more diversity before recommending a
graduation, as from my PoV that is the only thing this brand new
community is lacking at the moment.

Cheers
Niclas

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:54 AM, James Dixson <dixson3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok folks I believe we have our first Apache release candidate for Etch:
> apache-etch-1.0.2-incubating.
>
> With this release we have updated all of the licensing/headers for the
> project to meet Apache standards, fixed a few bugs and validated under
> Windows, OS X and Linux (Ubuntu).
>
> Complete listing of what was fixed is here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dtrue&pi=
d=3D12310835&fixfor=3D12313456
>
>
> We *have not* in 1.0.2 changed the package names from "etch" to
> "org.apache.etch", that change will be in our next release,
> apache-etch-1.1-incubating, which will be ready for release in another 2-=
3
> weeks. We did not change the package names to maintain compatibility for
> folks running the pre-apache 1.0.x releases who are only interested in
> bug-fixes.
>
> We have met the threshold for committer votes in the following threads:
>
> =A0http://n2.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.0.2-td2294748.html
> =A0http://n2.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.0.2-(second-attempt)-td2360187.h=
tml
>
>
> The candidate files can be found here:
> =A0 http://people.apache.org/~dixson/apache-etch/1.0.2-incubating/
>
> Each file has a MD5, SHA1 and a Signature.
>
> Finally, the output from RAT is also included in the "*-rat-output.txt"
> file.
>
>
> --
> james
>
>


--=20
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org