Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57837 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2009 22:17:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2009 22:17:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 39721 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 22:17:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39167 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 22:17:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39156 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2009 22:17:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:17:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.20] (HELO mail-ew0-f20.google.com) (209.85.219.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:17:44 +0000 Received: by ewy13 with SMTP id 13so7493584ewy.12 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:17:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qsFiaMyOp73zIvi8HdgWbTMVgSe0wLaNvs39y0XMi1Y=; b=Fw0LrjK0VR6o7CMyyYF+ru3S2T7YopH6Rx53aydSLmKdvu7oWAPEH1bi33/lMP2ZT5 imLxMG4Fgna3ex6iYu6TjsoO9eJqIdi9yX8PjgP+M8iT5e7LtCuZ4AWh1xpDSfzrkHLr lfpPER1z3hLwKpuwTzfygBrsBhGh0YpwiwTNI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=efBYJJ0XDQNiyZRUcnlgF99eJsUDNY5Glc5x2sjPPDD1ZQg6G8kSEfLBZNuBCdjTKJ GOOpMMQuXhjYMUk+SDyqNFwDmr9xyrVlbMRIa5lITQHGlzC64PQNfMVXe1mR8R3PA/bj jHusV2dgXXZ9X20x64L33u3OXuL6z34gGS7jE= Received: by 10.210.38.17 with SMTP id l17mr7300697ebl.168.1231193844144; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:17:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from bslm-046.corp.day.com (cable-static-138-82.eblcom.ch [87.102.138.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b30sm13870981ika.7.2009.01.05.14.17.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:17:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <496286F0.4060009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:17:20 +0100 From: Felix Meschberger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Some advice needed on JSPWiki package names References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > Janne, > > You and I had the same thought. I suggest going with org.apache.JSPWiki, as > suggested by you in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-465?focusedCommentId=12660676# > action_12660676. I would not go that route, actually I agree with Harry Metske in [1] in that respect. BTW: That CORBA and IOP package names are included with JDK is more a sign of the "quality" of that code, than a good example (just my $.02). BTW2: This is just a personal thought .. Regards Felix [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-465?focusedCommentId=12660689#action_12660689 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org