Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
References: <381300.38273.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: J Aaron Farr <farra@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:13:05 +0800
In-Reply-To: <381300.38273.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Gurkan Erdogdu's
 message of "Fri\, 3 Oct 2008 13\:48\:47 -0700 \(PDT\)")
Message-ID: <m2ej2lulge.fsf@apache.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (darwin)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com> writes:

> Hi to all;
>
> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans.
>
> It is in the WIKI, its address is
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal

I have a number of questions before I can support the proposal:

Where do you expect this code / community to end up after the
incubator?  Will it be part of Geronimo?  Part of MySpaces?  It's own
TLP?  I can say now that if the project is to stand on its own, then
there's a lot of work to do.

It seems as though there are 2 or 3 other Apache licensed efforts in
creating a RI for JSR-299: Gavin King's work, JBoss's work and the
rumored Guice work.  What makes this RI effort any different?  Why
should the ASF support this project instead of one of the others?

I'm concerned that there's only one listed committer.  Getting to at
least 3 committers is going to have to be the first order of business
for this podling.

--=20
  J Aaron Farr     jadetower.com        [US] +1 724-964-4515
    =E9=A6=AE=E5=82=91=E4=BB=81         cubiclemuses.com     [HK] +852 8123=
-7905

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org