Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mwessendorf@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.90.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=G72/+Bj0m3UxCHHYIotsDW6lk+Egt09XIgm91jaWaLm2aBcmHVe7zCSfy8YTCWWj3f
         Fp1YJGWkOgwrX1dgu414ERaizjpMpkrPvnetItKxqRdtlh9A7GS2m2Nf/SWkXU+DT6zp
         6UQWvG8hn4OKDO1kVrWH8G0vQDr1wCl0KkYzc=
Message-ID: <71235db40810070148x7b2d265fjf4dbd2de3095f5b5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:48:42 +0200
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew@apache.org>
Sender: mwessendorf@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
In-Reply-To: <783038.10909.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <783038.10909.qm@web38202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be part of the EG?

no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA.
The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans...
this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed.

When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can
work on the NDA.

@Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote
beginning of next
week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal
etc. No need
to rush, isn't it ?

-M

>
> Gurkan
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
>
> I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs.
> You need a NDA for that.
>
> -M
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kevan, Matthias;
>>
>>  The project current code base is in the sourceforge -->  http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.
>>  I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously.
>>
>> About Implementation :  So far,  only Web Beans specification that is published is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to implement the specification, I created my own API.  But now,  I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences.
>>
>> There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl folder.
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi to all;
>>>>
>>>> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans.
>>>>
>>>> It is in the WIKI, its address is
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal
>>>
>>> I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording
>>> change "Geronimo will include" ==> "Geronimo may include".
>>>
>>> Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge.
>>>
>>> Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans
>>> implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their
>>> project?
>>
>> really ? Interesting.
>> The "JBoss WebBeans RI" is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it
>> looks like their TCK will be as well)
>>
>> See here:
>> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org