incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niclas Hedhman" <>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers
Date Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:10:01 GMT
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<> wrote:
>> The company that a committer work for must acknowledge that the employee(s) in question
are allowed to work on Apache projects.
>> In this case, that is Cisco, and we have no CCLA at all on file from Cisco.
> This is incorrect (unless you are speaking of you).
> CCLA's are a convenience for the benefit of ICLA signatories.  It is not the
> incubator's responsibility to validate that ICLA signers are legally able to
> do so.  Depending on their contractual relationship to their employer/contractor
> they may need this or they may not.
> Point ICLA signers at this document to reinforce the fact that they -might- not
> be able to sign the ICLA without it.

Ooooook.... So, what you are saying is that we now asking the
committers to become legally affluent?

My point; What happens to average committer candidate when the
employer says "No, you don't need us to sign this..."?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message