incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
Date Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:39:30 GMT
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 04:51 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is required to be an apache
> committer?  Since when?

No. The other way around. If you want to sign an NDA agreement in
relation to gaining access to a TCK or something, you need to be a
committer. Only committers are allowed to sign them. That is what is
being said.

A blanket all committers must sign an NDA would be the death of Apache,
eh?

Upayavira

> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >> How to get or sign this NDA to view current draft spec? Is it required to be
part of the EG?
> >
> > no, that is an Apache thing. You need to be committer to sign the NDA.
> > The NDA on the other hand gives you access to TCK etc. In case of WebBeans...
> > this shouldn't be a big deal (TCK) since it is actually Apache 2.0 licensed.
> >
> > When this project is accepted, you will be an Apache committer and we can
> > work on the NDA.
> >
> > @Vote: You asked about the vote, why not planing to start a vote
> > beginning of next
> > week ? This will give some folks some more time to read the proposal
> > etc. No need
> > to rush, isn't it ?
> >
> > -M
> >
> >>
> >> Gurkan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 10:23:22 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
> >>
> >> I am part of the EG, but I can't share the draft PDFs.
> >> You need a NDA for that.
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >>> Hi Kevan, Matthias;
> >>>
> >>>  The project current code base is in the sourceforge -->  http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.
> >>>  I am developing the remaining pieces of the specification continuously.
> >>>
> >>> About Implementation :  So far,  only Web Beans specification that is published
is EDR-1, in this EDR-1 there is no API contract of the specification. So when I started to
implement the specification, I created my own API.  But now,  I looked at the http://seamframework.org/WebBeans
address and it defines the API contracts and some of the concerns explained in the EDR-1 are
changed. I am trying to adapted my implemented API contracts with this unpublished API. I
explicitly commented on these changes in the source code. I think there is no so much differences.
> >>>
> >>> There are two folder in the implementation, webbeans-api is the API and
webbeans-impl is the implementation. All the unit test are contained in the webbeans-impl
folder.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks;
> >>>
> >>> Gurkan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 6, 2008 3:34:34 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL - OpenWebBeans Project Proposal]
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi to all;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have posted a proposal about the project, named OpenWebBeans.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is in the WIKI, its address is
> >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWebBeansProposal
> >>>>
> >>>> I made a few minor editorial updates (spelling/grammar) and one wording
> >>>> change "Geronimo will include" ==> "Geronimo may include".
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you point us to the current project? I couldn't find it on sourceforge.
> >>>>
> >>>> Last I recall Guice was planning on an Apache licensed WebBeans
> >>>> implementation. Is that still their plan? Any discussions with their
> >>>> project?
> >>>
> >>> really ? Interesting.
> >>> The "JBoss WebBeans RI" is Apache 2.0 licensed as well (and it
> >>> looks like their TCK will be as well)
> >>>
> >>> See here:
> >>> http://seamframework.org/WebBeans
> >>>
> >>> -Matthias
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --kevan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>>
> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message