incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Crossley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-93) Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+By+Incubator needs clarification or be followed
Date Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:53:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638161#action_12638161
] 

David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-93:
-----------------------------------------

One issue seems to be that these documents do to not differentiate between the "Sponsor" being
some other existing PMC or the Sponsor being the Incubator PMC (on behalf of the board). When
read from the former point-of-view, they make more sense than the latter.

Craig summed it up:
"...If the Sponsor is *not* the incubator, then the paragraph you cited applies. If the Sponsor
*is* the incubator, nothing else is required."
Bill's words earlier in that thread are useful:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200810.mbox/%3c48E39E27.1020304@rowe-clan.net%3e

In another thread Jukka summed it up:
"No ACK needed, as it was the Incubator PMC itself who just voted."

>From those words we should be able to add an introductory paragraph in those sections
to remind.


> Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+By+Incubator needs clarification or be followed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: INCUBATOR-93
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-93
>             Project: Incubator
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: policy
>            Reporter: David Crossley
>
> This section details the next step after a successful acceptance vote. It involves a
special message to general@ and acknowledgment from IPMC and 72 hours wait. It seems that
this is not being followed, rather just doing a vote summary. Does this section need review,
or is this a necessary due-process type of thing? It should at least be clarified who can
do this step.
> This arises because i am investigating why some projects are not commencing properly,
e.g. adding to reporting roster and getting their status document started.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message