Return-Path: 
 <general-return-19963-apmail-incubator-general-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 74767 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 12:20:30 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 12:20:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 54872 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 12:20:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54724 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 12:20:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:general-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54713 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 12:20:26 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:20:26 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.19 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.19] (HELO mail-gx0-f19.google.com) (209.85.217.19)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:19:22 +0000
Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so10639883gxk.12
        for <general@incubator.apache.org>;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        bh=dcLve102n+8avlwDg3GcK59kvH1OWyj89ZudmDZ4zRE=;
        b=xI7Djt0a7OFlc0M6lxbk2EziSHCagBjFQjVHc6QNV4lDEefFu7cbik3djVXiu3mU+x
         9xiep7g5b+EVOFTCEJfWBklqGXdPZlNDD++CKrxozlhC2KbO8dciREcGnz/+7yylEdBj
         ml41O1xd2o4RRfUf2YUS56NV7jh36Nn4lQIGY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=E1SiPBzzctLVf7ZuBwqtY6FTlhphu5H/0fFH7uZz9eWN6hjn86c0O1mdgfuh/Zz7uL
         ftiSvueBSxFxtYbtCZcd01nexqAINs2ESGfojahW/DG5dTSKcwquyydmMURTVp3Kqn4A
         uzzYUBFp5tCMlqgSdGa5uOfvLSy44TeAE8UV8=
Received: by 10.151.51.18 with SMTP id d18mr4041754ybk.245.1222690796218;
        Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.91.15 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b9472b590809290519k4d2776afha00aae5ff89331c5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:19:56 +0100
From: "Marnie McCormack" <marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Project Diversity Guidelines
In-Reply-To: <b9472b590809290518m6fd14cbbt828dc9097a36c5f9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_29474_30106947.1222690796221"
References: <b9472b590809230845h121d00d3xe1f3a14de79c93e8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <caf30e2a0809232028h160de3e6rbbffb9b00eda247e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1D90F2A1-BFC1-4755-8A29-6445D1DA5807@SUN.com>
	 <b9472b590809290518m6fd14cbbt828dc9097a36c5f9@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_29474_30106947.1222690796221
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Meant to add that I'm feeling a chill over the idea of more docs here, so
I'll be off back to Qpid and poll our mentors instead :-)

Thanks Niclas & Craig,
Marnie

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Marnie McCormack <
marnie.mccormack@googlemail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Craig,
>
> <snip>
>  One thing that would help, especially in the case of qpid, is to document
> whether the committers feel that they are independent. That is, whether they
> would continue to contribute to the project on their own time even if their
> employer reassigned them to a different project.
> This is a great idea, and probably a more useful measure (in some ways)
> than simple employer disclosure. (Not that I have any desire to open up the
> suppurating sore that that discussion is !)
> We could list this on our graduation resolution, particularly where
> people's affiliation is not listed.
>
> Thanks for your input,
> Regards,
> Marnie
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Niclas
>>>
>>
>> Craig L Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>>
>

------=_Part_29474_30106947.1222690796221--