Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1688 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2008 21:37:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2008 21:37:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 94248 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2008 21:37:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94063 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2008 21:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94052 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2008 21:37:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:37:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.19] (HELO mail-gx0-f19.google.com) (209.85.217.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:36:39 +0000 Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so9732023gxk.12 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8kkhe5TBby4DtlMoTtHddMJee4EXZuV/43VGSVSGkUg=; b=pEjvIY408GyxDCr9fk+oqh2oEdkFBN/1S8Ex9ydkotEhvu4sGSh2c66Rvw1VLEPE1b /Tp1+5/rrSGI7rKb2BSH22SdE9igbBDDoSAm+X6/UOX8cR//wR7s3ZVhMVNblfwBWyaX l0Zmw5mmQU7p6FPS3ZxXK6m7ZGVEQ33wAz0dA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Pt5FAVoSca9fssFBmuSA7OmMK85lya+QGBJcckRkIgF8CpFJx+pUaa/M46ElAQprrN 9xrv3gsVhFhm1i3NxSyP6RkNF9UxnK9j7HvpGy7Utj5nNDlhUpOqAJqgztuuaO9Bj4HD Z1YYs3J2cuJOFtODUfvWDLcDXTzqd5wCEs4tU= Received: by 10.90.106.1 with SMTP id e1mr3487460agc.2.1222551372951; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.90.6 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <510143ac0809271436l3ef804a1w26a67cf7fe7c8423@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:36:12 +0200 From: "Jukka Zitting" To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: On incubating releases In-Reply-To: <19e0530f0809271421v1aee76bfkd7cfd8f4f10431bd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <510143ac0809260541h21809939u9252426780f1b5c6@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0809261301o6230aaeal865d123167235b6a@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0809270130w4f902992o1bbc3f7adacf1d50@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0809270453t74610422ue3a28ef8faa5f1f3@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0809270839o8ad0c75pbe6e74a075909049@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0809271010h3f39daaex7633c96eb3d6eb70@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0809271045m598a27c0if1bda7495b29a6e5@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0809271421v1aee76bfkd7cfd8f4f10431bd@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > I know...hence my VOTE was what it was. So my questions go out to people who opposed the proposed policy change: 1) Is it OK for project A to bundle the incubating dependency? 2) If yes, why should things be more complex for project B? BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org