Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67949 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 16:15:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 16:15:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 37672 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 16:14:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37537 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 16:14:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37457 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 16:14:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:14:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.79.199.57] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.79.199.57) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:13:53 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 65A87197CB1C; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:14:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter.Vvcjo5V9bu Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-24-91-141-225.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.141.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67164197CAD2; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:14:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kulp To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Incubator dependencies in Apache projects Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:14:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Kevan Miller References: <510143ac0809261340q72b13a37q86a28e975efee9f2@mail.gmail.com> <19e0530f0809261349n61e39eah8b6885933062a5af@mail.gmail.com> <9B03BBB5-A267-4DC6-A084-B0C45AE8E180@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9B03BBB5-A267-4DC6-A084-B0C45AE8E180@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809291214.22295.dkulp@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5-gr0 On Monday 29 September 2008 12:08:52 pm Kevan Miller wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Agreed. We've done this before and i bring it up yet again :) > > > > Geronimo PMC used Yoko, Yoko failed, they ended up absorbing most of > > the code. > > I wouldn't call Yoko *failed*. It didn't generate enough interest to > go TLP, but did become a sub-project of Geronimo. Also, portions were > donated to CXF. Seems like a *success* to me. I have to agree. All parts of the Yoko codebase are now supported and enhanced in active projects. That sounds like a success, not a failure. -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org