Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and
	apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release
From: Henning Schmiedehausen <henning@apache.org>
Reply-To: henning@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: empire-db-dev@db.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <20080916210417.L40113@minotaur.apache.org>
References: <20080906132153.L82797@minotaur.apache.org>
	 <0864536CC6E70F4F9FF85DE7334908CC234128@esteams1.esteam.local>
	 <20080916210417.L40113@minotaur.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:47:02 -0700
Message-Id: <1221626822.26750.130.camel@forge.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yes, they can. Every member of the empire-db svn group should be able to
change the incubator site files. Please try, if not, it is a bug.

	Ciao
		Henning

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:20 +0000, Thomas Fischer wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rainer Dbele wrote:
> 
> > ...
> > As far as I understand it, there are two major problems with the empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 release:
> >
> > 1. the missing freemarker info in the NOTICE file (we'll add HSQLDB as well)
> >
> > 2. the inclusion of servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar.
> 
> Plus the status page (about which you cannot do anything, but as I 
> understand it, it is a requirement that it is up to date when a release is 
> done). Maybe I can spare some time tomorrow evening to update it.
> 
> > We can leave the servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar out of the distribution 
> > but only for the price that it won't compile off the shelf, and this 
> > will make it more difficult for beginners to run the sample. Does anyone 
> > have a suggestion how to deal with that (given that we use maven only 
> > for a forthcoming release)?
> 
> I am no ant expert, but there seems to be a tool named ivy which can pull 
> it from the maven replository.
> 
> > Since all issues concern the empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 distribution, does 
> > this mean that the -1 is for this part only? And would you give a +1 for 
> > the empire-db-2.0.3 release? (Just want to make sure, we're on the right 
> > track).
> 
> As soon as the status page is up to date, I'd give a +1 to the db 2.0.3 
> release; if you think it makes sense to release it without the struts 
> extension.
> 
> > Since we built the 2.0.3 / 1.0.3 release we have made some improvemets 
> > and bugfixes. I suggest skipping these releases and continuing with the 
> > 2.0.4 and 1.0.4 release.
> 
> Hm, the 2.0.3 release is not released yet. You can still call the new 
> release 2.0.3. However, to avoid naming confusion, I'd suggest to call a 
> release candidate e.g. RC1 in the future, and rename it when the voting is 
> through (in the docs etc the "final" name can be used, but in the release 
> file names the rc part should be in. So you can just rename the files and 
> copy the tag once the voting is done.)
> 
> But calling the new release candidate 1.0.4 and 2.0.4 is also fine with 
> me.
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>           Thomas
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org