On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >> Within Apache FtpServer, a subproject of MINA, we would like to >> investigate the use of JSecurity to replace our current home-brewed >> security solution. Now, JSecurity is still in incubation. Would this >> pose a formal problem? > > If you can "complement" instead of "replace", then I think you have an > ideal situation. Yes, this is probably how things will work out anyways. At least for some time until we have had the time to do the full replacement. However, pretty much everything that is currently in FtpServer security-wise has a better replacement in JSecurity. So, for the long-run I think a full replacement would be the best option. But, while JSecurity is incubating, this might be a good option, also to have us get a better feeling for JSecurity before betting fully on it. /niklas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org