incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niclas Hedhman" <>
Subject Re: On incubating releases
Date Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:42:55 GMT
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jukka Zitting <> wrote:

> AFAUI there are three positions that people are advocating:
>    a) Releases with no other strings than the ALv2 attached
>    b) Releases with requirements to notify downstream users
>    c) No releases
> Personally I think that position b conflicts with both the letter and
> the spirit of ALv2, and that position c is damaging to incubating
> projects. Also, if a was not an option, I'd rather opt for c than b as
> I think c is at least a logically consistent position.
> What do other people think?

At this level, I agree with you Jukka. But that to make things clear,
we should keep Upayvira's comment in mind;

We need to consider the two aspects of what Apache stands for: open
source and open development.

If we just draw a simple line in the sand;

Open Source criteria met --> Allow Releases, standard normal ASF releases.

Open Development criteria also met --> Out of the Incubator.

Then I think we have a relatively simple guide-post on how to proceed.

As for downstream users getting caught up in community collapsing
Incubating projects --> Well, if they have a direct dependency on it,
they know the risk. If they are transitively dependent, the project in
between has the real headache, yet the sources are available.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message