Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96750 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 00:36:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 00:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 42285 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2008 00:36:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42096 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2008 00:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42085 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2008 00:36:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:36:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.39] (HELO smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:35:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 26071 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2008 00:36:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.239.140.137) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2008 00:36:04 -0000 Message-ID: <48867CF1.4050705@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:36:01 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tashi References: <488642BC.3020601@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <488642BC.3020601@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Doug Cutting wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> With respect to "Initially, we plan to start with one committer each from >> Carnegie Mellon and Intel Research, with a Yahoo committer to be >> determined >> later", that's awkwardly phrased. It appears to imply a corporate >> representative doing commits for "hidden" people, something that we >> consider >> to be an anti-pattern. > > That is not the intent. The intent is for Yahoo! to assign someone to > work on this project as a direct contributor. But that person has not > yet been identified. > >> Whomever is to be actively involved in development >> should be on the committer list. If it is just a community of just >> The Two >> Michaels, fine, but the wording should be rephrased. > > +1 If Y! does not name someone soon, then that entry should be removed. > A committer from Y! can always be added later, based on merit. No; the entry should be removed now. Yahoo the Company cannot place a reservation on a place at the table for an unnamed body. This is not how the ASF works. Nor are committers expressed as delegates of the institutions the work for/study at. This places a cloud over the acceptance of this particular project, and I would encourage everyone to be sure their mentors/champions review the text before posting a proposal for incubation.. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org