Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63468 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 63852 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2008 21:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63746 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2008 21:05:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63735 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2008 21:05:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:05:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=MISSING_MID,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.249.104.213] (HELO server.nechtandesign.com) (72.249.104.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:04:33 +0000 Received: from c-24-3-240-68.hsd1.pa.comcast.net ([24.3.240.68] helo=Angie-PC.nechtan.org) by server.nechtandesign.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDQYP-00022R-5i for general@incubator.apache.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:04:53 -0400 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:04:50 -0400 To: general@incubator.apache.org From: Angela Cymbalak Subject: RE: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin) In-Reply-To: References: <20080630200038.6597072494F@athena.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.nechtandesign.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nechtan.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <20080630210442.9BEB1724886@athena.apache.org> At 04:32 PM 6/30/2008, Noel wrote: > > I am convinced that Jackrabbit is the direction to go for the > > mid-tier of the application. > >My only question is whether or not we lose anything from that decision, but >if I didn't think that the JCR was the right way to go, I wouldn't have >brought it up. I don't think we loose anything. If I am reading the spec correctly for the JCR, we actually gain. Instead of dictating the storage mechanism we can easily give a choice. We can give a default storage mechanism (I would say the filesystem because everyone already has it) but if someone wants to replace that with a database or anything else they can. We gain a lot of flexibility that allows the application to be small and compact for a personal application, but the scalability that will make it a viable enterprise option. > > I just haven't figured out how Sling may play into that > >RESTful interface and ready-made framework for building applications that >use the project, perhaps even substantial parts of the project, itself? +1, if you are convinced that a RESTful interface is the way to go. I am mostly convinced it is a good way to go because there are large portions of the project that are already done if we go that way. As with your question above: do we lose anything by going with a RESTful interface? I haven't thought of anything and since I can't disprove it.... Angie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org