On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> As has been noted, the text of Justin's proposal fails to address
> that if the vote fails to gain the required binding votes, it is NOT
> lazy consensus. The standard rules still apply, and the PMC vote
> would be required to supplement the vote, not just a lazy
> ratification.
>
> Proposed change to Justin's text would be "After 72 hours and no
> requests by any Incubator PMC member for a full vote by the
> Incubator PMC, and if the vote is positive (three or more binding +1
> votes and no binding -1 votes), the committer request is approved by
> the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer invitation
> process."
Umm... why "no binding -1 votes"? I thought adding a committer
wasn't a vetoable thing, just code modifications. This should be a
majority approval vote thing. (with it linked to http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
for details)
Dan
>
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|