incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)
Date Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:01:39 GMT
+1

On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that  
> there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which  
> currently confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The  
> patch simply removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are  
> binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml	(revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml	(working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
> the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At  
> least
> three +1 votes are required (see the
> <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting  
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then  
> the Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send a
> summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message