incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <Craig.Russ...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes to ratify PPMC committers
Date Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:28:40 GMT

On Jun 6, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:

> On Friday 06 June 2008 09:26, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Just so I'm clear on the proposal, if the PPMC votes in private, and
>> no Mentors or PMC members vote, the vote passes with 15 non-binding  
>> +1
>> votes, and no binding votes, then lazy consensus (no +1 vote from any
>> PMC member) admits a new committer to Apache?
>
> No.
> See Noel's comment(s).
> All committer ballots require 3 +1 from PMC members. How can this be  
> so easy
> to misunderstand?

It's not that I don't understand.

It's that Justin's proposal as written doesn't mention the 3 +1 vote  
requirement.

Craig

>
>
> If the podling don't have 3 PMC members voting +1, then they should  
> raise a
> flag (which is a concern in terms of perhaps the Mentorship needs
> strengthening). If the posted not to private@i.a.o doesn't contain 3  
> binding
> votes, then there is no ACK...
>
>
> Cheers
> -- 
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
> I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Mime
View raw message