Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71679 invoked from network); 30 May 2008 15:44:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2008 15:44:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 75220 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2008 15:44:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74691 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2008 15:44:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74680 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2008 15:44:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:44:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.142.191] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 15:43:43 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w7so3361190tib.6 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.145.17 with SMTP id x17mr4871299ybn.102.1212162238041; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.8.15 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44b57a610805300843t32db4cf5te04e2537bf72fc87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:43:58 -0400 From: "Les Hazlewood" Sender: les.hazlewood@anjinllc.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: maven repository In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44b57a610805300806k5fd16fe6se18ce63b1568c459@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8985caa2fc31abe0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hrm - I thought you had to have IP clearance before you even were accepted as a podling. Or maybe its just that Alan is such a great Champion for us, that he helped us along that path before we even submitted our proposal ;) Under this assumption (that IP clearance exists already), it makes much more sense to allow the podling to publish approved releases to the central repository, but still under an org.apache.incubator.projectname group id to maintain convention/simplicity. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:38 AM, James Carman wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote: >> So it seems that a valid question is whether or not publishing to one >> repository or another indicates an endorsement. > > Yes, that's certainly a valid question. Again, that's just my > personal point of view. > > The biggest problem with incubator projects (again my opinion) having > releases is the IP clearance. Perhaps there should be multiple stages > of incubation. The first stage should be where you verify the IP > clearance and projects in that stage shouldn't be allowed to do > releases at all. Then they might graduate to the next stage and that > would be a "community building" stage where we make sure the project > has enough community around it. These projects should be able to > provide incubating releases. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org