incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Peterson" <dpeter...@google.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (INFRA-1585) Zone for Shindig
Date Wed, 07 May 2008 02:00:21 GMT
(+joes@apache.org, bcc: general@incubator.apache.org)

Joe, can you help us out getting this Zone setup?

Thanks!
-Dan

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Brian W. Fitzpatrick <fitz@google.com>
wrote:

> No objections in 2 weeks sounds like lazy consensus to me (or at least lazy
> :-).
>
> Forward this thread along to Joe and let's get this ball rolling.
>
> -Fitz
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Dan Peterson <dpeterson@google.com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Santiago Gala <santiago.gala@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> El mié, 23-04-2008 a las 14:20 -0700, Dan Peterson escribió:
> >> > Hey folks,
> >> >
> >> > As additional background, at ApacheCon EU, Noel Bergman proposed the
> idea
> >> of
> >> > Shindig getting a Zone (for running a sample instance, as well as for
> >> > nightly builds). Noel was actually quite surprised that we didn't
> already
> >> > have one. I think review board is a natural extension of what we'd use
> >> that
> >> > Zone for, to improve the quality of code reviews.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Count me on for setting up and maintaining review board. I have an
> >> instance running locally and got some experience making it work in the
> >> process. In addition it is written with django in python, and I'm using
> >> django, and loving it, in my day job currently.
> >>
> >>
> > Thanks, Santaigo.
> >
> > General@,
> >
> > Any other comments about if Shindig should be able to get a Zone? Or have
> we
> > reached lazy consensus?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Dan
> >
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Dan Bentley <dbentley@google.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Shindig wants to run an instance of review board, a nightly build,
> and
> >> a
> >> > > running reference server.
> >> > >
> >> > > Is this something shindig should do (using a Zone), or should we try
> >> > > something else first?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > -Dan
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> > > From: Joe Schaefer (JIRA) <jira@apache.org>
> >> > > Date: Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM
> >> > > Subject: [jira] Commented: (INFRA-1585) Zone for Shindig
> >> > > To: dbentley@google.com
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >   [
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591742#action_12591742
> >> > > ]
> >> > >
> >> > > Joe Schaefer commented on INFRA-1585:
> >> > > -------------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > I would appreciate it if you ran your request
> >> > > by general@incubator before we go any further.
> >> > > Infrastructure has not granted zones to
> >> > > incubating projects before, as the request
> >> > > for a zone typically comes from a PMC.
> >> > > If all you can get is lazy consensus on general@incubator,
> >> > > I suppose that's good enough for us.
> >> > >
> >> > > > Zone for Shindig
> >> > > > ----------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > >                 Key: INFRA-1585
> >> > > >                 URL:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1585
> >> > > >             Project: Infrastructure
> >> > > >          Issue Type: Wish
> >> > > >      Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> >> > > >          Components: Zones
> >> > > >            Reporter: Dan Bentley
> >> > > >            Assignee: Norman Maurer
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Shindig wants a Zone to run an instance of Review Board, a sample
> >> > > container, and a nightly build.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >> > > -
> >> > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >> > >
> >> --
> >> Santiago Gala
> >> http://memojo.com/~sgala/blog/ <http://memojo.com/%7Esgala/blog/> <
> http://memojo.com/%7Esgala/blog/>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message