Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59426 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 22:12:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 22:12:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23191 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2008 22:11:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23025 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2008 22:11:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23014 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2008 22:11:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:11:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kelvingoodson@gmail.com designates 72.14.204.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.204.230] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (72.14.204.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:11:24 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id z1so1490812qbc.10 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:11:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=BVJCVS+OHG1YwBFVK2d3VtCwIYekFErONMDHK0iINfI=; b=HoDAAxPdhyZD0I3UHXnAHdgtJOQ+w1lf0qvk+tku6Rha6Ahx/Ho6DMNhaPR22xjCQMhOJeLjuBWIvCWnvjcYmNcfc96GY/6ihUz10ziPneqhZBkzaDBcsilkKQItMHDBxXfKK/OkWqSYtb0GKJvByP55Wy6Xlq7ROhznAO5Pbhw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hFGcfo/5hXpoSgzd9fvko9xZ2RRAKUw7ZOoNS5KgcmWamEGBc5IfowpRJJaKeWLSfQIbZukq1ltZGxiZ3q6iHrFlPciej8C9slnfN8/O96T+6kUQahK3bhuDStW36niJzhvbdZ9mAI15Ey5jz3dyUfo26RUhngn/5Y+D7ZZACkw= Received: by 10.35.78.9 with SMTP id f9mr5796583pyl.39.1201990290452; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:11:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.31.8 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:11:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9deac9fd0802021411j600eccfevcebc793a543967b5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 22:11:30 +0000 From: "kelvin goodson" Sender: kelvingoodson@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link In-Reply-To: <88f5d710801310602s2657c41cge43ae6f8343553fa@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1031_298898.1201990290441" References: <9deac9fd0801310147k15fdc2a3w28023dd5ccc1d1fa@mail.gmail.com> <88f5d710801310602s2657c41cge43ae6f8343553fa@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bc7ffa21eaaf3978 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_1031_298898.1201990290441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Paul, what was it about the proposal section discussing Tuscany that confused you? I think what we were trying to say is that this work belongs in a project of it own, since Tuscany has a so much wider scope than this, and the overall aims of the proposal are quite different. The new project requires an environment where it can focus on the clear aim of implementing this JSR RI and TCK, or future versions, without the distractions that would come with being part of a larger project; needing to address the community issues that having a wider remit would require. Kelvin. On 31/01/2008, Paul Fremantle wrote: > > Kelvin, NoNameProposers > > Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard > questions! So here I go: > > Perhaps you can explain why this effort isn't being rolled into the > Tuscany work. > > There are some obvious reasons why I am confused by this proposal: > > 1. Tuscany already has the objective of producing code for SDO, and > already has code for SDO. > 2. Tuscany was another proposal to the IPMC predominantly coming from > IBM and BEA employees. > 3. The BEA committers left Tuscany and created a fork elsewhere > 3. Tuscany has been identified as lacking diversity. > > Why will this project gain diversity when Tuscany is finding it hard? > This move seems designed to make it even harder for both Tuscany and > NNYP to get diversity by splitting the pool of potential committers > even more thinly. > > I did read the paragraph on the relationship to Tuscany but I'm afraid > I came out more confused. > > I'm sure there are more hard questions but I think that's enough to be > going on with. > > Regards, > Paul > > On Jan 31, 2008 9:47 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal > > > > That's what you get for employing reuse tactics -- gmail remembers the > > original URL. I've been caught by this before, so I thought I had taken > > appropriate action to avoid this behaviour, but sadly not so, apologies. > > Kelvin > > > > On 31/01/2008, kelvin goodson wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal > > > > > > We haven't got a good name yet, SandStorm is a contender, as is > Snowdon > > > > > > Suggestions and comments welcome, > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > paul@wso2.com > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > ------=_Part_1031_298898.1201990290441--