Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10453 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2008 04:58:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2008 04:58:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 38856 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 04:58:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38729 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2008 04:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 46095 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2008 01:31:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <47A66AEA.2040703@apache.org> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:31:22 +0000 From: Simon Nash User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link References: <9deac9fd0801310147k15fdc2a3w28023dd5ccc1d1fa@mail.gmail.com> <88f5d710801310602s2657c41cge43ae6f8343553fa@mail.gmail.com> <88f5d710802030931o56714e83y9fbc0ac45a44fcbb@mail.gmail.com> <13D2B15D-1AEE-4CBF-85B5-D697D720F905@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <13D2B15D-1AEE-4CBF-85B5-D697D720F905@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote: > >> Meeraj, Jeremy >> >> Please read my note again. At no point did I say or imply that BEA led >> anything. The only thing I said about BEA was: >> "the two companies who couldn't agree to do it together in Tuscany". >> >> Is there anything incorrect about that statement? I'm willing to be >> corrected if I'm wrong. > > Paul, I was responding to the general theme. Comments on this thread > have included "The BEA committers left Tuscany and created a fork > elsewhere" and "BEA pulls off and starts a fork." I have heard it said > elsewhere as well that BEA forked Tuscany and I just want to try and > dispel that meme - if anything, Jim from BEA was more hesitant about > splitting than Meeraj and I (who don't work for BEA and never have). > > It wasn't the companies who couldn't agree - it was the individuals. > > -- > Jeremy > I agree with Jeremy and Meeraj that this was about individuals rather than companies. Given this, I don't see any reason to presume that a different group of individuals from BEA and IBM wouldn't be able to work together successfully on another project. Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org