Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pzfreo@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=A7HRKULtz8IvPGLt5+C9RXx4XLz0/F7pyA2GCgPQACpqqoXguhOK/uYpgMaumWpleqc/gNxBtlEcxvWgNLHm+DS9QIc82G0FC32e/pOVmVZGDxtHpVFOyKCF5AfZBhrwpRTqg1DHE9RqHagaO9aZCOyAe6WtgdiSCS9SGrTAwVg=
Message-ID: <88f5d710801310602s2657c41cge43ae6f8343553fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:02:03 +0000
From: "Paul Fremantle" <pzfreo@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link
In-Reply-To: <9deac9fd0801310147k15fdc2a3w28023dd5ccc1d1fa@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <9deac9fd0801310147k15fdc2a3w28023dd5ccc1d1fa@mail.gmail.com>

Kelvin, NoNameProposers

Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
questions! So here I go:

Perhaps you can explain why this effort isn't being rolled into the
Tuscany work.

There are some obvious reasons why I am confused by this proposal:

1. Tuscany already has the objective of producing code for SDO, and
already has code for SDO.
2. Tuscany was another proposal to the IPMC predominantly coming from
IBM and BEA employees.
3. The BEA committers left Tuscany and created a fork elsewhere
3. Tuscany has been identified as lacking diversity.

Why will this project gain diversity when Tuscany is finding it hard?
This move seems designed to make it even harder for both Tuscany and
NNYP to get diversity by splitting the pool of potential committers
even more thinly.

I did read the paragraph on the relationship to Tuscany but I'm afraid
I came out more confused.

I'm sure there are more hard questions but I think that's enough to be
going on with.

Regards,
Paul

On Jan 31, 2008 9:47 AM, kelvin goodson <kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
>
> That's what you get for employing reuse tactics -- gmail remembers the
> original URL.  I've been caught by this before, so I thought I had taken
> appropriate action to avoid this behaviour, but sadly not so, apologies.
> Kelvin
>
> On 31/01/2008, kelvin goodson <kelvingoodson@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
> >
> > We haven't got a good name yet,  SandStorm is a contender, as is Snowdon
> >
> > Suggestions and comments welcome,
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal>
>


-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org