incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Kitching>
Subject Re: moving a failed incubation project
Date Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:26:04 GMT
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> On Jan 23, 2008 7:23 AM, Paul Fremantle <> wrote:
>> Niall
>> Asking someone politely to rename the package is hardly throwing our
>> weight around.
> Well you were talking about "need to change the package name" and
> "rigorous protection" rather than some kind of "hey we'd prefer
> it...".
> If people are so keen on *protecting* apache in this way then rather
> than starting with a failed incubator project, then how about this
> stuff:

Again, that is a bit different from the original TCIK issue. It
*appears* that here they are not doing this in order to *distribute* a
forked copy of tomcat, but instead to support tomcat as an alternative
internal servlet-engine implementation within their own j2ee server. In
other words, I would think that:
(a) you could not normally download this code except by downloading the
entire glassfish server, and
(b) they are not actively developing this code to add new features
(forking) but simply adding a few patches to make it integrate better
with Glassfish.

The alternate implementations of commons-logging have also been
mentioned in this thread. This is not the same IMO. Commons-logging is
both an API and an implementation. People should be able to provide
alternate implementations of an API, and that is what slf4j are doing
for example; they are not providing a "patched" or "forked"
commons-logging, but instead a complete alternative implementation, and
are distributing just the minimum amount of code to provide the same api
to users.

* distributing a few classes in order to implement an apache API : ok
* distributing a copy of apache code for the convenience of users of a
larger package, perhaps with a few minor tweaks for better integration: ok
* publishing code to the world which bears no resemblance to code
approved by the ASF: not ok

All this just just my opinion of course..


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message