incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator
Date Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:22:05 GMT
The CXF build fails several tests.

Environment:
Maven version: 2.0.8
Java version: 1.5.0_13
OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"

Log file:

http://people.apache.org/~sebb/CXF


On 30/01/2008, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
>
> The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in
> distribution; it should not have any details of transitive
> dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed.
>
> The line
>
> This product includes/uses software(s) developed by 'an unknown organization'
>
> is rather unhelpful; there are 3 organisations involved and the NOTICE
> should mention these separately and by their proper names.
>
> There are also multiple additional mentions of 'Apache Software
> Foundation'; some of these give http://jakarta.apache.org/ as the ASF
> web address, which is clearly wrong. None of the additional mentions
> should be present - they just make the file difficult to read.
>
> The LICENSE file needs to contain copies of all the 3rd party
> licenses, or at least pointers to them, see:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
>
> It should list the exact jars to which the 3rd party licenses apply, e.g.
>
> jdom-1.0.jar - see licenses/jdom.txt
>
> Having the version number is important as the license may change for
> different versions.
>
>
> On 30/01/2008, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The policy page says:
> >
> > "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
> > Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three
> > +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the
> > PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive,
> > then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> > general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> > Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." -
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >
> > Its a separate approval vote so wouldn't that require an explicit vote? Is
> > it so hard to vote over here as well?
>
> +1
>
> >    ...ant
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2008 6:10 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@sun.com> wrote:
> >
> > > As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what
> > > difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
> > > > vote in
> > > > this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
> > > >
> > > >   ...ant
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Just a quick update while the vote is open.....
> > > >>
> > > >> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-
> > > >> dev.
> > > >> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
> > > >> open....     :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Dan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > >>> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> > > >>> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to
2.0.3
> > > >>> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> > > >>> during some interop testing.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For a full list of the issues, see:
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
> > > >>> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote thread is at:
> > > >>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
> > > >>> ml
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the
> > > >>> votes
> > > >>> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they
> > > >>> are
> > > >>> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join
the
> > > >>> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The staging area is at:
> > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator<http://people.apache.org/%7Edkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator>
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Edkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo"
> > > >>> directory
> > > >>> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > > >>> m2-incubating-repository.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This release is tagged at:
> > > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
> > > >>> /
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> > > >>> release!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > > >> Principal Engineer, IONA
> > > >> dkulp@apache.org
> > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Craig Russell
> > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > > 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> > >
> > >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message