incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Fwd: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
Date Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:46:17 GMT
Oops. I accidentally sent the following to my own email address,  
rather than general@

--kevan

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> Date: December 18, 2007 1:01:08 PM EST
> To: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
>
>
> On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
>>> provide a pointer in the vote mails]
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
>>> contributions from IBM:
>>>
>>> "Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
>>> "IBM UIMA License Agreement".
>>>
>>> however, that license is not in LICENSE, nor is it linked from  
>>> there.
>>
>> The code covered by that software grant would now be covered by the  
>> Apache License. I would not expect to find the software grant  
>> agreement in the license text/files. Haven't looked into the hash/ 
>> checksum issues...
>>
>> On further review, I am changing my vote to a -1.
>>
>> The source code in svn (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.1/uimaj-2.2.1-06

>> ) does not contain a LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER file in the  
>> top directory. Refer to http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html if  
>> you have any questions.
>
> Given the discussion of what constitutes a "release", I'll change my  
> vote to a +1. I still think it's good practice to include the  
> licensing information in base svn dir. And don't see a downside to  
> including it...
>
> --kevan


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message