incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thilo Goetz <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:06:25 GMT
sebb wrote:
> On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler <> wrote:
>> Leo Simons wrote:
>>> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>>> On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder <> wrote:
>>>>> ...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
>>>>> up policy
>>>>> during a release vote
>>> +1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so* annoying that this
>>> keeps happening.
>>>>> like this as it makes it very frustrating for
>>>>> poddling. How about letting this UIMA release out as-is for now
>>>>> while we
>>>>> work this out?...
>>> Yup. It always gets fuzzy when voting and discussion intermix, but I
>>> do count 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes. That typically
>>> means the vote passes, so UIMA can release.
>> Right the vote runs for more than 72 hours and we have 3 +1 votes and
>> one -1 vote.
>> The other open issue was the checksum representation for MD5 and SHA1.
>> The representation can be improved and we will do this for the next release.
>> (I already opened a JIRA issue for that). It is just open what we have
>> to do for the current release.
> I've created reformatted versions for the src and bin archives in:
> in case that helps.


> I've not fixed the Maven hashes.
> I don't know whether the Maven hash-checking can cope with the format
> or not - and does it ignore hash files with incorrect format or what?
> If it does not handle the format properly, this could cause download
> problems.

The hashes for the maven artifacts are generated by maven, in the format
that maven wants them.  There should be no problem, there hasn't been in
the past.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message