incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:34:34 GMT
On 18/12/2007, Thilo Goetz <twgoetz@gmx.de> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 18/12/2007, Michael Baessler <mba@michael-baessler.de> wrote:
> >> Leo Simons wrote:
> >>> On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >>>> On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> ...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be making
> >>>>> up policy
> >>>>> during a release vote
> >>> +1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so* annoying that this
> >>> keeps happening.
> >>>
> >>>>> like this as it makes it very frustrating for
> >>>>> poddling. How about letting this UIMA release out as-is for now
> >>>>> while we
> >>>>> work this out?...
> >>> Yup. It always gets fuzzy when voting and discussion intermix, but I
> >>> do count 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes. That typically
> >>> means the vote passes, so UIMA can release.
> >>>
> >> Right the vote runs for more than 72 hours and we have 3 +1 votes and
> >> one -1 vote.
> >>
> >> The other open issue was the checksum representation for MD5 and SHA1.
> >> The representation can be improved and we will do this for the next release.
> >> (I already opened a JIRA issue for that). It is just open what we have
> >> to do for the current release.
> >
> > I've created reformatted versions for the src and bin archives in:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/UIMA/
> >
> > in case that helps.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > I've not fixed the Maven hashes.
> >
> > I don't know whether the Maven hash-checking can cope with the format
> > or not - and does it ignore hash files with incorrect format or what?
> > If it does not handle the format properly, this could cause download
> > problems.
>
> The hashes for the maven artifacts are generated by maven, in the format
> that maven wants them.  There should be no problem, there hasn't been in
> the past.

OK.

I thought I'd seen one with the different format, but I've just
rechecked one or two and they hold just the hash. Sorry for th
diversion.

That format would be fine as the bin and src archive hashes too.
Having the file name as well is only essential for a file containing
multiple hashes.

> --Thilo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message