Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92282 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2007 22:23:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2007 22:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 68148 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2007 22:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68034 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2007 22:23:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68022 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2007 22:23:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:23:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthieu.riou@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.235 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.235] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.235) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:23:07 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id o37so252382nzf for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:22:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=UL/lDvsNyiUjWqyhiRgczL9GEDP+o1zkvK3hqvavqsI=; b=iunC6DBkgdMMGNZtoF0WPCc/qNqjDpRGFaZSGzmAAEN5W7XwoITLI08xcnUle+jGVgdYLxu2HaIwHUnCHii3orBhj8IsrEcNdp0d9b39JQATXqoPYNtUymqoBjAhcuOuHNl45VcqtQ/Nql7zLwsZmen3uL3ncWV164C+ENd7dqo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=gQRghTCRUUxgLwmoNxHSQLfoi4A17aiNVhpHZHPAwr9Re4SCY1Q6mpCMTim6AG1z4qGpG+3CnIcilOAs/ooBm0di2QbVJ9vbXxn16c9BAeEzsZLHErSuWjiibvBVeInS2Dm2q23yX0SvtLoADLPNN1W0MDkYhMlHn012MKsm8pA= Received: by 10.114.209.1 with SMTP id h1mr1832672wag.1193869365252; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.76.5 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:22:45 -0700 From: "Matthieu Riou" Sender: matthieu.riou@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Diversity requirement In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10103_1403603.1193869365252" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2bcea03547984bf3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_10103_1403603.1193869365252 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Oct 31, 2007 2:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Matthieu Riou wrote: > > > IMHO 3 legally independent committers can be very hard requirement, > > especially for small sized project. > > How hard is it for users when the company paying them all abandons the > project, and we don't have enough mass and diversity for it to continue? > And that is just one effect of insufficient diversity, to to mention the > benefits of diversity in decision making. > Actually this comment was due to my misunderstanding of the "independent committers" formulation, I thought it meant independent as not working for any commercial entity instead of not working in the same company. Bill clarified it and I'm totally fine with that. I'm not arguing against the benefits of diversity, I just wanted to make sure the incubator could remain relatively "small project friendly". Cheers, Matthieu > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > ------=_Part_10103_1403603.1193869365252--