Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74718 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2007 15:34:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2007 15:34:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 49582 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 15:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49460 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 15:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49449 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2007 15:34:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:34:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OIMO,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.112.202.2] (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:34:30 +0000 Received: from localhost. ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1-dev) with SMTP ID 922 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:34:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: Subject: RE: How strict should podling release reviews be? Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:34:02 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <71e1b5740709280040v4037bb64s1e7f7830ccd5ecd0@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden > style reviewer role. When it comes to legal issues related to a release, the warden role is the more appropriate. It benefits neither the project nor the ASF if we are lax in that regard. Some of the things that they need to do are identified by RAT, and would be non-issues if they would correct their build process to do them automatically, e.g., inserting the license and disclaimer files where they are supposed to go. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org